At
the Old Vic
Publicity
No company likes to risk opening a play ‘cold’ in London.
An out-of-town tour is a chance to iron out staging problems—one
of them, the trucking on stage of the Queen’s noisy bed, was solved by
dispensing with it altogether. By
the time Hamlet returns to its home, the Old Vic, it has spent five weeks on
the road, including a gruelling fortnight of one-night stands in Germany
with hundreds of miles to coach travel every day.
Now,
back on a familiar stage, the actors should be able to concentrate
entirely on their performances and characterization.
They must be at their best because future ‘business’ depends on
how critics and audiences react to the first week of performances.
Hamlet,
untypically, opened sold out for three weeks, with an ‘advance’ of
£21,000 already in the box office, thanks to the television reputations
of Derek Jacobi and Timothy West. Even
the previews were sold out. It
is the custom to invite to these the managers of ticket agencies, large
and small, and (shrewdly) the hall porters of major London tourist hotels.
It may all help to build the ‘word of mouth,’ that mysterious
factor of personal recommendation which can sometimes save a show even
after the newspaper critics have panned or roasted it as a ‘turkey’ or
a ‘bomber’—there are many synonyms for a flop but they are no
comfort if you are in one.
Before
opening night the publicity office (in this case one hard-worked girl)
goes into high gear in attempting to build an audience.
There are two press nights. The
national newspapers’ drama critics and show business correspondents,
international papers, Reuters, BBC radio, certain prestigious weekly
magazines—these are on the first night list.
The majority of magazines, local papers, and tourist ‘What’s On’
publications are invited to the second night.
Personal
contacts are made to set up interviews with the leading actors (sometimes
even the author) on radio and television, or with profile writers, show
business and gossip columnists. There
is a photocall at which the company in full costume perform the difficult
feat, at 11 o’clock in the morning, of throwing themselves into excerpts
from the play and freezing at dramatic moments for a row of blasé
photographers. Production
stills by the company’s own photographer are given away.
The rest of them are already up on the boards outside the theatre,
soon to be joined, it is hoped, by favorable excerpts from the critics’
notices. Handbills go out to
the ticket agencies and social clubs; coach tour operators are offered
reduced ticket prices for party bookings; the educational authority and
school drama advisers are encouraged to arrange school visits (Hamlet
is always on someone’s examination syllabus).
Perhaps
the biggest factor for success or failure is the ticket agencies, known as
‘the Libraries.’ If
interested, they take half the seats in the house, usually the left hand
side of the auditorium, while the theatre box office retains the right
hand side. On a typical show,
a third of the seats booked in advance will be sold by the libraries, a
third by the box office and the remainder will be sold on the doors on the
day of performance.
The
first night audience for an unknown play would often be depressingly thin
were it not for the giving of complimentary tickets—‘papering the
house.’ Obviously there are
‘comps’ for the management’s friends, the ‘angels’ who
have put up a share of the production costs (in a commercial theatre), the
agents, relatives and friends of the cast (who may get four free seats
each allocated to them). But
in this case tickets are like gold dust.
Critics
The critics are greeted in the foyer by the theatre publicist,
Priscilla Yates, given a program and invited to have a drink in a
private bar upstairs in the interval.
First nights generally ‘go up’
at 7 p.m. half an hour early, because morning newspaper deadlines vary
from 10:45 to midnight. Even
speedy Hamlet plays for over
three hours—overnight critics
can scarcely ever see the duel—and will ‘come down’ about 10:15. No wonder critics do not often stay to applaud.
If you see a man in an aisle seat, striding out and grabbing his
coat, apparently unmoved during an ovation for the cast, he is not
expressing displeasure, he is just a critic.
It
is commonly, and wrongly, believed that critics decide together in the
interval whether to turn their thumbs up or down on a show, like the
Vestal Virgins at a gladiator contest.
This persists in spite of the fact that their notices so often
disagree. In fact there is
a strong convention among critics that it is ungentlemanly and never
done to speak to one another about that night’s production.
Though
actors owe much to the appreciation of critics—no one ever complained
of a good notice—the two species are natural enemies.
It is rare, and unwise, for them to be friends offstage.
Adverse criticism is always hard to forgive.
It is harder still to believe it just, not because actors are so
vain but because they are so vulnerable.
In
another two hours the critics will be in their seats and the die will be
cast. How does a director
feel at this eleventh hour? ‘I
feel it belongs to the actors now,’ Toby Robertson confesses
privately. ‘There are things which will never be quite as I want them.
But you have to work with your actors and, especially, with your
Hamlet. This Hamlet is
perhaps a more rational man than I saw originally, but Derek has to find
his own interpretation.’
In a
radio interview that day, Derek Jacobi has been saying exactly that:
‘In the end you can only say that’s how I
play Hamlet.’ But he adds
that his performance is more aggressive because of his director.
Both
of them are showing the strain in the form of imaginary ailments,
inability to eat and sleep, mysterious pains.
‘My body is saying it doesn’t want to do it,’ says Jacobi
.
The notices were, as usual, ‘mixed.’
You never get unmitigated compliments, let alone raves, for Hamlet
because it is too rich a play, too much a Himalayan peak of a part, for
anyone to give the definitive interpretation.
If Hamlet is a man of action, he
will be criticized for not being a philosopher.
He will either be not mad enough, or not sane enough, and so on.
Unorthodox touches—such as this production’s delivery of ‘To
be or not to be’ not as a soliloquy but as an intimate confidence to
Ophelia—will be praised by some and taken severely to task by others,
as ‘not what Shakespeare intended’—as though Shakespeare had left
explicit instructions.
Do actors read their notices?
Leading actors always say they don’t—and there are good reasons not to.
‘But I heard enough about them to upset me,’ said Derek
Jacobi, some months later. ‘If
people come up and tell you not to take any notice of what X or Y said,
you know they’ve given you a roasting.
The one I did read insisted that I had got the stresses wrong in
certain lines and suggested it was because I did not know what the lines
meant. That was really a
bit much, a bit insulting. It
bothers you the next night when you play the lines.
You assume, quite wrongly, that everyone there has read the
notice too, and is thinking the same thing.
The only thing to do as an actor is to forget it.’
He obviously hadn’t. It
still rankled.
Even compliments can be unsettling
because they can make the actor self-conscious the next time he plays
it. ‘A lot of effects are
unconscious on the actor’s part.
You literally don’t know how you get them.
You come to that place again and you wonder what you did that
made them say it was so good. Then
you can easily be lost.’
Overseas
Repertory, tough and demanding
as it is, gives you no time to recuperate.
Fresh or tired, elated or downcast by the first night reception,
the very next morning the cast starts work on a new play—Antony
and Cleopatra—soon joined by Dryden’s version of the same story,
All for Love.
The
strain of playing one Shakespeare play at night after rehearsing another
all day is considerable. Altogether,
there are four plays in production, all of them having to be ready
within five weeks of one another. There
is not quite enough energy left to work 13 hours a day, and there is a
spate of resignations (mostly withdrawn later) among the overworked
production staff.
No
one has had a day off, other than Sundays, from March to July.
The new productions are not played in to anyone’s satisfaction.
Some people are feeling the effects of cholera and typhoid
injections in preparation for the five-week Middle Eastern tour which
follows. Morale, for a few
dangerous weeks, is floundering.
It
is in this overstrained and overtired state that the company has to
prepare to take Antony and Cleopatra as well as Hamlet
on tour of the Eastern Mediterranean.
The British Council, showing the flag culturally at foreign
festivals, fixes and pays for the extremely expensive travel involved,
which no company could afford out of its own coffers.
From
the company’s point of view, foreign touring keeps the actors employed
for so many weeks of the year, when it might otherwise have to disband
for lack of enough touring dates at home.
From the fees paid by foreign festival organizers there may be a
modest profit of around £5,000. From
the actors’ point of view there is the attraction of a bit of
realization in usually agreeable surroundings.
They are put up at very good hotels and given a daily allowance
of £8-£10 in local currency for meals.
A
British Council representative gives a preliminary talk on their role as
unofficial ambassadors and recommends prudent behavior, salt tablets,
and the removal of Marks and Spencer labels from their underwear before
entering an Arab country. Only
the barest of scenery is taken on tour, and two lorries have already set
off to drive across Europe with it plus the heaviest furniture and props
which cannot go by air.
At
11:00 on a Saturday night the company finishes its last performance at
the Old Vic. At 8:00 the
next morning the actors meet again at London Airport to catch the flight
to Istanbul. The penalty
for missing the place is dismissal.
There isn’t another flight till Thursday.
|