Much Ado About Nothing

Stratford  
By Irving Wardle
Times 4/82  

      With this production Terry Hands completes a trilogy of the middle-period comedies and, unlike Twelfth Night and As You Like It, he has got it right first time.  Coming in the immediate wake and in total contrast to the National Theatre version, the show is sheer enchantment. 
     
For once that handy phrase describes the approach as well as the spectators’ response.  At both ends of the play, Hands extends the action beyond the textual limits, setting the tone with the opening tableau of a Vermeer-like cellist and the closing sight of Beatrice and Benedick left alone on stage holding an inaudibly inexhaustible conversation under the fading light.  It is a fable of two people who were meant for each other.
      For their environment Ralph Koltai supplies an elemental space provided by a series of stenciled perspex walls; a transparent labyrinth where dazzling foreground scenes are played against lights of winking stars until a huge orange sun finally descends on an empty stage.
      The walls serve numerous uses, but their main contribution, assisted by stark black and white costume, is to project the diurnal contrast of light and darkness so as to resolve the near tragedy of Hero within the comic boundaries.
      As with the two previous productions, Mr. Hands treats Much Ado as a comedy of growing up:  if there is a penalty for this it comes at the start, which introduces Sinead Cusack’s Beatrice as a bouncy, over-emphatic flirt, forever showing off to circles of silently convulsed admirers, and bringing you wholly into sympathy with Derek Jacobi’s Benedick.
      This impression survives only to their second meeting when Benedick’s peremptory exit reduces her to the brink of tears, and from that point on both performances develop into as humanely funny an exploration of their relationship as I have seen.  Mr. Jacobi is not at all the usual military figure, though he can command a fine martial ring when announcing that the world must be peopled.  Much of the way he plays the underdog, his voice full of wheedling and impotently exasperated inflections, often playing the mock innocent with farcically prolonged vowels.
      The production treats them as very different people, establishing the contrast most boldly in the eavesdropping scenes.  Benedick is played as superbly inventive comedy, with repeated embarrassing returns by the boy who finally throws the book after his master’s retreating back.  But when Beatrice turns up for the treatment, comedy is abruptly switched off.
            There is also a powerfully articulated surrounding action. The other characters seem larger than their usual size. There is a definitive Dogberry in the ogreish person of Terry Wood, reacting with mounting fury to every question, and subsiding with an almost audible hiss of escaping hot air at being called an ass.  Derek Godfrey’s Duke, eyebrows like astounded exclamation marks, is a figure of awesome authority and emphatically not one of the boys.  Robert O’Mahoney’s Claudio swings between the full extremes of adolescent guilt and arrogance.  Old Antonio (Jeffrey Dench) takes his stick to them both in transports of senile rage; even the Friar tries to round up the couples like a frisky sheepdog.

Back to Articles Index